Has any Body Fitted a ZR 160 Engine in to Maestro?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MG Maestro zr160
Collapse
X
-
They may well have ended up being scrapped when development work had finished, due to Type Approval issues.1983 (Y) MG 1600
1985 MG EFi with digital dash (owned since 1987)
1987 700 City 1.6 Van
1988 Tandy camper 2.0D
1990 Advantage, just 29k on the clock
1990 Clubman D
1990 MG 2.0i (spares donor)
(all Maestros)
Daily drive: Rover 25 GTi
Weekend rave: Honda Civic Type R GT
Current projects: Allegro 1.7HLS, Allegro Equipe
Comment
-
As said the K series mules were maestro/montego. So they'll physically fit. An interesting and fun car at the end of it too as they'll be nice and light.www.maestroturbo.org.uk - The Tickford Maestro Turbo Register
www.rover200.org.uk - The Rover 200/400 (R8) Owners Club
www.roverdiesel.co.uk - My Rover Diesel Site
Comment
-
But they rev and rev. Lighter and pokier than an A series too!www.maestroturbo.org.uk - The Tickford Maestro Turbo Register
www.rover200.org.uk - The Rover 200/400 (R8) Owners Club
www.roverdiesel.co.uk - My Rover Diesel Site
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russ View PostWith as much torque as Stephen Hawkins in a power cut
In ZS120 tune the 1.8K develops 160nm of torque at only 2750 rpm and 117 ps hp.
Very similar output to the 2.0i 'O' series?My name is Darren.
Home of a Maestro for 30 years.
1983(Y)Maestro 1.3 HLE (Nellie) Very poorly
1995 Rover 214SI
2004 MG ZS 120
2006 LandRover 90 TD5
2014 Volvo V40 T3 R-Design.
Comment
-
But weighs about half as much!www.maestroturbo.org.uk - The Tickford Maestro Turbo Register
www.rover200.org.uk - The Rover 200/400 (R8) Owners Club
www.roverdiesel.co.uk - My Rover Diesel Site
Comment
-
Headgaskets aren't that bad once replaced with the uprated items.www.maestroturbo.org.uk - The Tickford Maestro Turbo Register
www.rover200.org.uk - The Rover 200/400 (R8) Owners Club
www.roverdiesel.co.uk - My Rover Diesel Site
Comment
-
1.4 was bullet proof
I remember when the K series came out, it was very reliable. Very very reliable by Austin Rover standards. I don't remember any negative reports at all. Of course that all changed when the 1.6 and 1.8 versions came out. It is strange it was never sorted out under B*W ownership.
Comment
Comment