Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Show us your Maestro/Montego...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ho hum...

    Well sorry for using the correct name for my car.

    Suppose I'll be calling 'GGT a Maestro Clubman next, as it is the same mechanically.
    Steve Worsley

    R514 RVJ - 1998 Rover Maestro 1.3 - Restoration
    VX12 EBG - 2012 MG-6 GT 1.8T SE - Stored
    J209 PEL - 1991 Rover Maestro 1.3 Clubman - Running

    Comment


    • Originally posted by F170 GGT

      As someone once said regarding Diesel cars: the " i " in " TDi " isn't necessary, as all Diesels are "injected."

      "Di" can also be the abbreviation for 'direct injection' however, although this isn't exactly as 'cutting edge' now as it used to be.

      Originally posted by F170 GGT
      I don't have an EFi, although yes my 2.0i will be undergoing a "conversion" in the near future.
      Obviously not everyone *wants* a turbo as Matthew Semple has pointed out in another thread, but I'd recommend converting an EFi engine to Turbo. It sounds one hell of a mod and performance is equal to the Montego Turbo with the added bonus of smoother throttle response over carb cars. Pity Motobuild don't carry out such work anymore....

      John

      1989 MG Maestro Turbo no.399


      1994 Maestro Clubman Turbo Diesel

      Comment


      • Does it really matter?

        This is the sort of pedantic hot debate over not much that gives "enthusiasts" of anything a bad image to everyone else. This is wandering dangerously into the realms of green anoraks, thermos flasks and notepads now.
        Jonathan Sellars

        1987 MG Maestro 2.0 EFi
        2011 Jaguar XJ

        Comment


        • Originally posted by D428CHO
          Does it really matter?

          This is the sort of pedantic hot debate over not much that gives "enthusiasts" of anything a bad image to everyone else. This is wandering dangerously into the realms of green anoraks, thermos flasks and notepads now.
          :laugh:

          No there shouldn't be a hot debate over simply pointing out, and using the correct name for a car.
          Steve Worsley

          R514 RVJ - 1998 Rover Maestro 1.3 - Restoration
          VX12 EBG - 2012 MG-6 GT 1.8T SE - Stored
          J209 PEL - 1991 Rover Maestro 1.3 Clubman - Running

          Comment


          • Wish I'd just kept my bloody trap shut
            Regards
            John Orrell

            MG Maestro Turbos 396 and 502
            MG ZT190+ (53 plate)

            Comment


            • Originally posted by FI70 GGT
              Unless I am reading wrong, my car tells me, in bright red badging that is a.........
              Originally posted by MGTurbo
              That looks like faded red to me.
              Sorry! But that did crack me up :laugh:
              Rover 200 and 400 Owners Club (for wedge shape rovers, including coupe, tourer and cabriolet). - www.rover200.org.uk

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Skatiechik
                Sorry! But that did crack me up :laugh:
                Things with no depth to them usually do. By the way, I didn't say it wasn't faded, just bright red.
                Steve Worsley

                R514 RVJ - 1998 Rover Maestro 1.3 - Restoration
                VX12 EBG - 2012 MG-6 GT 1.8T SE - Stored
                J209 PEL - 1991 Rover Maestro 1.3 Clubman - Running

                Comment


                • Originally posted by F170 GGT


                  Sorry, I can understand where you got that from, but we already know that it's electronically fuel injected, as the " i " in " 2.0i " states.

                  As someone once said regarding Diesel cars: the " i " in " TDi " isn't necessary, as all Diesels are "injected."

                  I think the 'I' in your case stands for irritating.


                  However, on a TDI, it could quite easily be 'intercooled' for example.

                  And yes, everyone knows the 2.0i is injected, but i'm still confused, why convert to 'Efi' spec when you already have it????

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by F170 GGT
                    Things with no depth to them usually do.

                    Oi behave!. No flaming allowed remember.
                    www.maestroturbo.org.uk - The Tickford Maestro Turbo Register
                    www.rover200.org.uk - The Rover 200/400 (R8) Owners Club
                    www.roverdiesel.co.uk - My Rover Diesel Site

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by M170 RFA
                      Pity Motobuild don't carry out such work anymore....
                      Good Job they dont imo

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by MGTurbo
                        And yes, everyone knows the 2.0i is injected, but i'm still confused, why convert to 'Efi' spec when you already have it????
                        I'm not. As you said, it has the same mechanics... I was only on about the name being 2.0i rather than EFi. Perhaps Skatiechik didn't realise it's just the same model with a slightly different name...

                        BTW, does anyone have a Montego/Maestro MKIII dashboard and center console going spare?
                        Steve Worsley

                        R514 RVJ - 1998 Rover Maestro 1.3 - Restoration
                        VX12 EBG - 2012 MG-6 GT 1.8T SE - Stored
                        J209 PEL - 1991 Rover Maestro 1.3 Clubman - Running

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by F170 GGT
                          BTW, does anyone have a Montego/Maestro MKIII dashboard and center console going spare?
                          Would that be K-reg? If so you're welcome to come help yourself to the corpse of my Maestro. I'm in Telford.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by SubCat001
                            Good Job they dont imo

                            Too right. Think the only people who think motobuild are great are people on here that read their £5 catalogue which came out about 15 years ago. If they were so great they would have made the Efi system work properly with the turbo, the reason it didnt was because it was bodged...

                            Gareth

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by MGTurbo
                              Too right. Think the only people who think motobuild are great are people on here that read their £5 catalogue which came out about 15 years ago. If they were so great they would have made the Efi system work properly with the turbo, the reason it didnt was because it was bodged...

                              Gareth
                              Still think the concept of an EFi turbo is great though, pity that it's hard to get a gearbox totally up to the task. Yes, I have been reading the catalogue (year 1995/7). Whilst Motobuild are expensive and not exactly a flawless company it appears that there were very few other specialists for Maestros & Montegos during the 80s and 90s so you can't knock 'em for supplying tuning parts that the average person may never have got hold of.

                              John

                              1989 MG Maestro Turbo no.399


                              1994 Maestro Clubman Turbo Diesel

                              Comment


                              • and here is my monty vdp (fingers crossed this works) :laugh:
                                Attached Files

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X